Date: 23 April et seq. 2010
To: www.Alumnishockerblackandgolds.com
Political Snippets
The liberals have expanded the definition of “profile”, and plead the case ad nauseam to mean absolute wrongdoing, to the point that the definition now seemingly constitutes a self contained oxymoron. In any decision or consideration, if the issue under consideration contains its own characteristics and elements uniquely identified with the issue; are you not “profiling” the issue, by considering the characteristics? And, if not, why not? The liberals don’t mind affirmatively considering the characteristics as a qualification, when they serve their purpose, ie: affirmatively considering Blacks, when considering acts alleged to be prejudicial to Blacks as a minority race; when considering acts alleged to be prejudicial to gays and their significant others, as it relates to their alleged marital “rights”, and societies refusal to recognize same; etc., etc., ad nauseam. But let the issue be, for example, the consideration of the locust infestation of illegal invader Mexicans, and the liberals scream “profiling”, if you want to look at “Mexicans”, and consider whether or not they are illegal. The liberals foot stamping, jump up and down, marching, verbal objections, constitute self contained convoluted oxymoron rationale. If I am concerned with the issue of illegal invader Mexicans, why, in common sense, can I not look at or consider Mexicans? And, how is it [will brain dead liberals please explain], one can come to any reasoned solutions for the issue and problem, without looking at and considering Mexicans? If I want to go to watch a baseball game, I don’t go to a basketball arena and look for basketball players, and I don’t go to a football stadium and look for football players. If you want to consider any issue, you have to consider the factual elements that constitute the issue. That is, unless you are a brain dead liberal. Then you scream “profiling”.
We were not allowed to “profile” Obama. If the liberal networking media and press had allowed themselves to consider the elements, abilities and demands of the office, vis-a-vis Obama’s qualifications for same, and to, in short, “profile” Obama, we would not have had an inattentive election by a majority of Americans. The treacherous media and press, had they done their Constitutional freedom of the press duty to properly inform the public, would have generously advised the public of Obama’s 20 year attendance and dedication to the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, and further advised of Obama’s mentor, the radical socialist Sol (Owinski?), the Pentagon bomber, rules for radicals instructor, etc. But Obama was black you see, and any criticism of Obama was considered by the treacherous media and press as racial profiling, verboten and not allowed, notwithstanding he was running for the highest office in the land.
6 May 2010: Yesterday was Cinco de Mayo for the Mexicans. I intend to consider recognizing Cinco de Mayo, an 1862 regional battle victory against the French, not Mexico’s independence day,
precisely when the illegal alien Mexican democrats in our country, pledge allegiance to the United States of America, and celebrate American victories at Goliad and San Jacinto.
But Obama celebrates Cinco de Mayo by reading his Teleprompter against the new Arizona law, thus:
“We can’t single out law abiding citizens that way, nor law abiding “immigrants”. We can’t divide the “American” people that way.” (Emphasis added).
In the first instance, we are not looking for citizens, we are checking for non-citizens. The fact that there are legal Hispanic American citizens, is not an excuse for not checking, once someone is stopped for some other legitimate reason. If for some legitimate reason someone is stopped, and then their exists some other reason to suspect that person may not be a legal American citizen, say for example, he or she can’t speak English, then the fact that there exists in this country persons of Hispanic descent, is not rationale for not checking the person stopped. Obama’s exhibited Teleprompter rationale is mere sophistry, and specious, intentionally deceptive argument. For example, carried to the extreme, if one person existed in the country legally, of any one nationality or identified race, then you can’t ask any other person of that nationality or identified race, to identify his legal status in the country. The result of such an absurd Obama Teleprompter rationale, would be that the whole world would be entitled to illegally infest the United States for immediate welfare Vision Card support, free ER health treatment, and free schooling for their kids, and we couldn’t ask any questions or do anything about it, as the liberal dims, oxymoron like, would claim we were “profiling”.
In the second instance, there is no such thing as “law abiding immigrants” as to the entire group, as pretended by Obama’s Teleprompter; there are only “law abiding legal immigrants”, and “illegal invaders”. Illegal invaders, are not immigrants. Immigrants have to go through the legal “immigration procedures”, and when successfully accomplished, are admitted into the United States as “legal immigrants”. Those folks who illegally enter the country, now somewhere between an estimated 20 to 22 million illegal invaders, are not “immigrants”, they are “invaders”, precisely because they are illegally in the United States.
In the third instance, Obama’s Teleprompter says: “We can’t divide the‘American’ people that way. The illegal invaders, are not Americans, they are mostly Mexicans, and some other folks from points south. United States Americans are North Americans. Mexicans are Central Americans. And points south are South Americans. And, if Obama’s politburo of intended election stealing socialist Marxist plotting Teleprompter writers, means to include Central Americans in the statement of “We can’t divide the American people that way”, then again, it’s just pure sophistry, and specious, intentionally deceptive argument. We have no jurisdiction over Mexico. Mexican citizens illegally in the United States, are not citizens of the United States, and do not have the Constitutional rights of United States American citizens. They are illegal invader Mexican democrats. If they want rights (as they march on Cinco de Mayo carrying signs saying: “We have rights”), they should go back home to Mexico, where they are citizens, and where they have Mexican rights, whatever they may be. But they have no, and should have no, American rights, being illegally within the United States in the first instance.
Obama is a narcissist marginal fool, in the sense of a self loving unthinking brain dead socialist Marxist ideologue. The distinction is that Obama’s Teleprompter scroll is written by his politburo of thinking brain dead socialist Marxist ideologues. But the same Teleprompter, by its exhibited rationale, confirms beyond reasonable doubt, the sorry quality of the collective minds of Obama’s politburo of treasonist treachery plotters. And, on almost every occasion, Obama and his politburo of treasonist treachery plotters rely upon chicanery, trickery, deception and dishonest artifice, and intentional bald face lies; in their attempt to manipulate the American public, which they consider to be the fools.
These dims hide their chicanery behind high sounding compassionate rhetoric and linguistic mental masturbation. Food stamp Welfare Cards, are converted to “Vision” Cards, but they are still, in substance, food stamp Welfare Cards, just supposedly hidden by a high sounding name. That makes it socially more acceptable to the brain dead liberals who are sensitive to the criticism of their welfare reservation policies.
Our forefathers clearly considered the possibility of electing a rogue Treasonist President of the United States, and so provided for same in the Constitution. “In Case of the Removal of the President from Office,...” Article II, Section 1.
Given the significant amount of disastrous damage to our country, in such a short amount of time, we can hardly suffer another 6 months of the unfettered free reign damage of the regime, and Obama should be removed from office forthwith. Well, Article II, Section 4, says:
“The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”
Obama has consistently used lies, treason, treachery, and bribery in the execution of our office of President of the United States that he occupies. But lets pass over the Treason and Bribery acts in Obama’s: malcontent, get even with them, racist, redistribution to people of color; attack on capitalism, American workers’ jobs, and our country, that ought to at least constitute Misdemeanors; and just Impeach Obama for “other high Crimes and Misdemeanors”.
Further, it might even be a Crime to fraudulently represent you were born in the United States and therefore Constitutionally qualified to be President, if you were in fact born outside the United States. Obama has an affirmative duty of proof on the issue, and instead of taking a pack of 30 liberal networkers and campaign supporters to Hawaii shortly before the election, and getting the democrat governor of Hawaii to seal Hawaii’s state records regarding his birth and the country, state, and hospital of his birth; Obama should be legally required by Court order to release those records and/or otherwise ordered to authorize and request Hawaii to release any and all such relevant records, or both.
It seems that if the House issues Bills of Impeachment, and the Senate tries Bills of Impeachment; and since the majority of the House is democrat; then if the republicans can convenience the proper number of democrats that it is obvious they will not be retained in office in November, absent their vote for a bill of Impeachment; then perhaps enough democrat representatives who want to preserve their positions, will be willing to vote for a bill of Impeachment. If such a Bill would be obtained from the House, it matters not that the Senate probably could not try the Case by November. It would effectively tie up the Congress and preclude any further treasonist damage to our country until the November elections, when Americans can change the Congress out of democrat control. There you have it. Although unlikely, that’s the only potential solution for stopping in its tracks the treasonist damage to our country, that I can think of. It obviously relies upon the reason of democrats – an oxymoron – recognizing the mood of the country and the high likelihood that the only way to save themselves in office as a democrat, is to vote for the Impeachment of Obama. Even should the vote fail, it would have a chilling effect upon the Congress. Perhaps the republicans could have Gallop or some such to run a national poll to see if Americans would support a Bill of Impeachment of Obama.
And, it is precisely these democrats voting for a Bill of Impeachment, that could take over the democrat party from the liberal dims, should Obama be convicted by the Senate. There are already a dozen or so long term democrats that have seen the writing on the wall and have determined to retire rather than to suffer the embarrassment of defeat in November. They should be candidates to vote for a Bill of Impeachment, and thereafter reconsider their decision to retire. Maybe sufficient other democrats would come to their senses and vote for a Bill of Impeachment.
Just released unemployment figures show and increase from 9.7 to 9.9 percent for unemployment and an increased underemployment up to 17.7 percent. The new number for those looking for jobs, is also up. But Obama and his State run networking intriguing Media and Press where out immediately spinning, deflecting the damage, falsely claiming victory because more people are looking for jobs. However, it’s not a victory when more people are looking for jobs, simply because their unemployment benefits have run out. And in any case it doesn’t mean more jobs are available just because more unemployed folks are looking for jobs. It could just mean more people want a better life style, than what simply eating on their food stamp welfare “Vision” cards will provide, and therefore want more money.
By: Fred Marrs
Subscribe