Date: 1 April 2010
To: www.Alumnishockerblackandgolds.com
Political Snippets
Isn’t it just so true, that the fruit doesn’t fall far from the tree. Like most folks I suppose, I am extremely proud of my mother. She is 90 now, and at 90 she doesn’t look for confrontations and arguments. She is just content to go through her daily life in a friendly amicable manner bothering no one. But she is straightforward and honest to the bone, and is not shy to stand up for what she believes. Today she was called by some National Poll. The first question they ask was: “Do you approve of Obama’s policies?” Her immediate answer was: “No.” They then ask: “Why not?” Mom, in her straightforward fashion got right to the heart of it, and answered: “Because he is a lier.” The pollster then heatedly said: “We ought to prosecute you for lying.” Mom said: “Well, do what you want, but I am an American and as long as we have a Constitution and freedom of speech, I’m entitled to speak my mind. You asked the question, and I think he’s a lier.” The pollster then hung up. Lets see, it was suppose to be an unbiased national poll. When they didn’t get the answer to the first question they wanted, the bigoted Democrat pollster tried to intimidate my 90 year old mother. Of course, she will not be included in the poll or its represented results. That’s how these liberal dim polls work you see, they go out trying to get the results they want, and if they get the opposite result from an inquiry, they simply don’t include the response in the poll. Moreover, this pollster was even so bigoted that he lost his poise and presence of mind, and felt obligated to threaten: “We ought to prosecute you for lying”, from what he knew from her voice had to be, an elderly lady. And, of course, he gave away his bigoted representative capacity on behalf of democrats, by use of the word,“We” ought to prosecute. Liberal dims are such wonderful zealots. We can no longer live with these liberal brain dead Socialists. It’s time to vote every democrat out of office in November if we want to keep our country and our freedom. In the interim, contribute to every conservative candidate you can.
Date: 2 April 2010
To: www.Alumnishockerblackandgolds.com
Political Snippets
Steve McIntosh has joined the side of ruin of the United States of America. Our radio resident closet thinly veiled brain dead liberal thinks he can hide his true liberal allegiance, so as to better try to influence public opinion. Recently in his regular monologue, McIntosh ended his call for bi-partisanship with the quote: “United we stand, divided we fall.” McIntosh would give up his freedom upon the alter of bi-partisanship, which he defines unilaterally as applying to republicans. Republicans are always asked by liberals to partake of bi-partisanship, by which we understand they define as agreeing to do what liberal dims want to do. Not hardly. Liberals have made their own bed, and they are now going to have to lie in it and suffer being kicked out of office in November.
Obama and his turnip patch of radical liberal Socialist Fascist leaders of our government, “F-ing” this “F-ing” that Rahm Emanuel, Pelosi, and Reid, determined in their infinite wisdom that they wanted no “bipartisanship” whatsoever as they plotted and continue to plot to destroy our capitalist system and our country as it has existed for some 223 years. Now, with 56 percent of the American people believing that the government is a danger to our freedom, suddenly liberals are profoundly concerned with and want conservatives to bail out their sorry arse with “bipartisanship”.
In the Massachusetts election for the Senate seat of Ted Kennedy, Massachusetts voters substantially elected Cris Brown, a republican. The stakes could not have been higher. And, the libs understood that if the Massachusetts Ted Kennedy seat was lost, they would lose their 60 votes in the Senate, and the Senate would be subject to filibuster. The dims might then have to be “bipartisan” in order to get 60 votes to make sure they could get their unilateral bills through the Senate; which “bipartisanship” had to be avoided at all costs. It was so important, that they even sent Obama in to campaign for the liberal dim, to no avail. The democrats in Massachusetts who held this seat for 50 years in a 2 to 1 registered democrat state election, couldn’t even steal the election, as Brown won by over 100,000 votes. Of course, McIntosh would have us all to understand and believe that currently both democrats and republicans are all on an equal basis in supporting the Constitution, and that Obama and his brain dead liberal Socialist Fascists are just main stream Americans that only wish to be “bipartisan”.
There is a clean hands principle of law, that says: “He that seeks equity, must do equity.” Obama and his turnip patch of liberal Socialist Fascists did not seek equity, and do not now want equity. They just want the vast majority of Americans to sit quietly by and allow Obama and his turnip patch of plotters to trash the Constitution and shove Obama big government power grab national lack of health care down our throats, at an unbelievable estimated cost of over two trillion dollars, which like all government programs, will balloon in reality. McIntosh in his “Statist” support, wants this same disaster to be confirmed by the Populus like lemmings, and to just go along with our loss of freedom.
We conservatives did our party duty and exhibited our “bipartisanship” by supporting Sen. John McCain. With his bipartisanship campaign, he accomplished nothing except to give us the national disaster of Obama and his attempt to turn our county into a Socialist Fascist utopia, with Obama’s prodigious gargantuan ego as the supreme dictator.
As I say, McIntosh would give up his freedom on the alter of bipartisanship. To McIntosh, procedure is to be prayed to; just ignore the effect of the loss of freedom. In short, republican resistance needs to come to Jesus and genuflect to democrat tyranny. Well, I’m willing to live with a little Thomas Jefferson republican resistance, as stated in a letter from Paris, November 13, 1787, responding to William S. Smith letter concerning “The New Constitution” and Shay’s rebellion, thus:
“The British ministry have so long hired their gazetteers to repeat and model into every form lies about our being in anarchy, that the world has at length believed them, the English nation has believed them, the ministers themselves have come to believe them, & what is more wonderful, we have believed them ourselves. Yet where does this anarchy exists? Where did it ever exist, except in the single instance of Massachusetts (Shay’s rebellion)? And can history produce an instance of rebellion so honourably [u,1787 spelling] conducted? I say nothing of it’s motives. They were founded in ignorance, not wickedness. God forbid we should ever be 20 years without such a rebellion. The people cannot be all, & always, well informed. The part which is wrong will be discontented in proportion to the importance of the facts they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions it is lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty. We have had 13. states independent 11. years. There has been one rebellion. That comes to one rebellion in a century & a half for each state. What country before ever existed a century & half without a rebellion? & what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon & pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. It is it’s natural manure. Our Convention has been too much impressed by the insurrection of Massachusetts: and in the spur of the moment they are setting up a kite to keep the hen-yard in order. I hope in God this article will be rectified before the new constitution is accepted.” (Parenthesis added)(Emphasis added), “Thomas Jefferson”, Writings; Autobiography; A Summary View of the Rights of British America; Notes on the State of Virginia; Public Papers; Addresses, Messages, and Replies; Miscellany; Letters, Copyright 1984 by Literary Classics of the United States, Inc. New York, N.Y., Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 83-19917, Merrill D. Paterson Wrote the Notes and Selected the Texts for the Volume, p.911.
While I’m willing to live with a little Thomas Jefferson republican resistance “God forbid we should ever be 20 years without a little rebellion”, I will never meekly accept National Socialism under Obama as the supreme dictator, and no freedom at all.
Although cleverly disguised, McIntosh exhibits that he is just an ordinary type of brain dead liberal, droning on with his radio professionally bigoted liberal dedication. The best that could be said about this sleuth-hound radio attempted opinion maker, on the trail of conservatives, is that if he tried to opine something with legitimate reason, as opposed to his brain dead liberal Machiavellian cunning bleating, he would be seen as doing his Constitutional watch dog duty of the press and media, rather than his current trying to apologize for and prop up a failed Obama and his turnip patch of National Socialist Fascist plotters. McIntosh needs to either do his Constitutional duty of his position; or sit down, shut up his “Statist” brain dead liberal views alleged on behalf of the public, and stay the h—-- out of it, if he himself can’t be “bipartisan”.
Liberalism is not a policy; it is a disease of the mind. It is the inability to rationally deductively think and reason from true facts to solutions to problems as reasonably suggested from the facts. It is not a creed; it is a pestilence. (Inter alia dianatic dictum: “Churchill by Himself”, Edited by Richard Langworth, p. 252. By: Fred Marrs
Subscribe